Year: 2018

It’s a Small, Small World: GDPR — not just for EU lawyers

By Edward McIntyre

Macbeth and Duncan were returning from court when Clyde Tabbit caught up with them.

“Macbeth, got a question. Got a minute?”

“Here’s our building. Let’s go up to the office.”

“Really shouldn’t take long. Just a quick ‘yes’ or ‘no’ —”

“You never know, Clyde. Come, join us.”

When the trio were seated in Macbeth’s conference room, Sara joined them.

“Now we’re all here. OK, Clyde, what’s the quick question?”

“Well, I keep getting strange requests from a couple of clients.”

“Proceed.”

“So, I represent a guy who moved to Italy years ago. Permanently. But still has a business here. As well as in Italy and other places.”

“We get the picture. What’s the issue?”

“Well, he keeps making these flaky demands on me to identify all the information I’m ‘storing’ — Clyde used air quotes — on him. On his companies. Getting more and more insistent. I’ve blown him off. But he won’t stop.”

“Let me see if I understand. He resides in Italy. A citizen there?”

“Yep, dual. Some family connection.”

“You provide legal services to him?”

“Of course. He’s my client. Both him and his businesses. There and here. Why?”

“Have you noticed all the ‘privacy updates’ you’ve been getting recently? From social media sites and other internet providers?”

“Come to think of it, yeah. Keep getting one from CNN about terms of service and privacy and stuff. Annoying. Even from some law firms. Can’t figure why.”

“Likely GDPR compliance. I suspect that’s what’s triggered your Italian client’s requests.”

“GDPR?”

Macbeth nodded to Sara.

“The General Data Protection Regulation. Enacted in 2016, but effective May 25, 2018. The GDPR’s purpose is to provide a uniform law governing the protection of personal data across the European Economic Area. That’s the EU plus three other European countries. It replaces the individual national laws passed under the 1995 Data Protection Directive. The GDPR is intended, among other things, to clarify, strengthen and modernize data protection. Especially in light of the changes in how companies collect and process personal information.”

“So what. I’m not in Europe.”

“You provide services to a European citizen, living there. Some of the services related to his businesses there. Does he pay you in euros or dollars?”

“Euros. Conversion costs me money every time. But I’m here, not there.”

Sara continued. “The GDPR applies to any organization collecting or processing anyone’s personal information. Think ‘personal data.’ If that collection or processing is done in relation to activities of the organization established in the EU. No matter where the collection or processing takes place.”

“See, I’m not an ‘organization established in the EU’ — more air quotes. Doesn’t apply.”

“I understand your point. But if a U.S. firm offers services to EU residents, then the firm is subject to the GDPR. It’s a fact-based analysis whether a company is offering services to EU residents, but services payable in euros likely would be.”

“Ouch. Does that include my clients in France and Sweden, as well?”

“France is part of the EU; Sweden, joined the EEA. So, yes.”

“What does all this mean?”

“Essentially, it requires greater transparency by those who collect or process data to the owners of the data — among a lot of other things. Very stiff penalties for non-compliance.”

Clyde looked to Macbeth. “What does this mean for me?”

“From a professional responsibility viewpoint, two things come immediately to mind.”

“OK —”

“First, you have an ethical obligation under Rule 3-500 to respond to reasonable client inquiries. Given the effective date of GDPR and your transparency obligations, you have a duty to respond to your client’s questions.”

“All of them?”

“I’ll let Sara spend time with you about the GDPR requirements. She’s our expert. Ethically, the requirement is to keep the client ‘reasonably informed’ about significant developments in the representation. I think a change in law this significant to a client’s rights would be considered a ‘significant development.’”

“Other advice?”

“But be sure to remind your client that you, as a lawyer, are duty-bound — new Rule 1.6, former Rule 3-100, and section 6068(e)(1) — to keep all the client’s information confidential. ‘At every peril to yourself.’ You don’t share it. That should address some of the client’s legitimate data privacy concerns.”

“Good idea. Anything else?”

“Our duty of competence requires us to have or acquire the requisite skill and learning, or consult with a competent lawyer who has them, when representing a client. A COPRAC formal ethics opinion, and amendments to two ABA Model Rules, suggest the duty of competence applies to knowledge about technology. I think a lawyer representing clients in Europe has a duty to understand those clients’ GDPR rights. And the lawyer’s GDPR obligation toward those clients.”

“Even if we practice in the United States?”

“A small world just got a lot smaller, my friend. Spend some time with Sara in the conference room. She’ll walk you through all the new GDPR data privacy requirements, including the right to ‘be forgotten’ and what that might mean to our duty to former clients and conflicts, and such.”

“Wow!”

“Wow it is, my friend.”

Macbeth and Duncan started to leave, Macbeth humming the tune from “It’s a Small, Small World.”

Editor’s Note: The COPRAC opinion to which Macbeth referred is Formal Opinion 2010-179.

See also comments to ABA Model Rules 1.1 and 1.6, competence and confidentiality. New and revised Rules of Professional Conduct become effective November 1, 2018.
Read More

Be the Best You

By Joan R. M. Bullock

In the March/April issue I wrote the article, “Today’s Lawyer,” focusing on the solo and small firm practitioner. I noted how the DIY economy, fueled by commoditization of legal solutions from digital platforms, threatens the practices of solo and small firm lawyers. A similar commoditization — developing reusable templates for bread-and-butter legal work — functioned well for the small firm practitioner. The practitioner profited from being able to charge a reasonable fee based upon the value of the legal solution proffered even though the actual time taken to provide the legal solution was shortened through the repeated use of the template. In fact, the small firm practitioner could expand the practice by utilizing interns, new lawyers and paralegals to complete and review the template for client matters with a resultant growth in revenue and profits for the firm’s bottom line. Digital platforms such as LegalZoom, Rocket Lawyer, Nolo, LawDepot and even the Google search engine, however, took this commoditization of legal solutions one step further—making a form of the template accessible to the lay market, permitting these platforms to profit from the volume of those seeking access as well as from the subsequent queries that come from the lay market utilizing those templates.

The increasing competitive nature of small firm practice and the growing encroachment of digital platforms in the legal services market have resulted in seasoned practices being reluctant to bring on novice attorneys who cannot contribute to the bottom line early on. Law schools have stepped up to this challenge and are providing more skills and experiential training in the curriculum. But is this enough?

About a month ago I got an update on LinkedIn regarding an article entitled “How a Thomas Jefferson Grad Came to be in Charge of the Ivy League Alums.” The author, Frederick Shelton, President and CEO of the Legal Business & Marketing Consulting firm of Shelton & Steele, wrote about the “Rainmaker’s Reward” and the utility of street smarts. It’s no secret that those who are able to make it rain are prized in a firm. Lawyers who can bring in new business are highly valued, even if they do little of the work that they bring in and even if they give little face time in the office. They add directly to the firm’s bottom line and therefore are given deference. This deference extends to how much time they need to spend in the office and how much client work they need do. Rainmakers have options. A firm not willing to give this deference will soon find that the revenue generated by the rainmakers will leave with those rainmakers to more accommodating firms. This is the “Rainmaker’s Reward” and it is control over the lawyer’s professional destiny and personal life.

Many lawyers, however, are uncomfortable seeing themselves as rainmakers. It looks too much like selling. They’d rather do the work. After all, that’s what law practice is all about. Unfortunately, those who do the work can be easily replaced—by smarter lawyers, less expensive lawyers or other professionals, or even technology. For example, even in the “olden days” tax law was complicated, with many tax returns completed by lawyers. Over the years, tax lawyers lost tax return clients to accounting firms; accounting firms lost many of these clients to volume-based businesses like H&R Block; volume-based businesses lost clients to software companies that catered directly to individual taxpayers. Now, for the simplest returns, the IRS allows individual taxpayers to complete their return from the IRS website without having to purchase the software. The now pervasive use of technology to assist in completing the tax return has converted a manual, calculator with pencil-and-paper approach by a professional, to a gathering of documents, fill-in-the-box approach by the consumer. Taxpayers’ ease in utilizing technology, coupled with software that replaces the judgment of a professional in determining the significance of the taxpayers’ information has, to a large extent, demystified the tax return process.

With more of the lawyer’s work being replaced by technology, it is critical that the lawyer develop a level of street smarts along with embracing the skills of a rainmaker. The sitting at the desk waiting for a prospective client or a supervising attorney to ring your phone or stop by your office and provide you with work is no longer a viable option. Street smarts is the creative edge needed to see and exploit gaps for competitive entry and differentiation. In this regard, the successful lawyer creates his or her own path for job security. A great example of this is TJSL alumna Candace Moon, who was profiled in the June 2018 issue of the ABA Journal. She created her entry into the practice of law by discerning and exploiting the gap in the craft beer industry.

Ultimately, lawyers want to have a sense of fulfillment, to believe that they are making a meaningful difference in the world and impacting their clients in a positive way. This can only happen if first, lawyers have control over their personal and professional lives. Accordingly, teaching law students today must include life skill lessons. We’ve heard it before: “In the event of loss of cabin pressure … place the oxygen mask on yourself first before assisting others.” Life happens to everyone. Lawyers take care of and counsel others best when they are in a good place by having first taken care of themselves. Be the best you for your clients and your firm. Take care of yourself — first. Read More

Hiring Trends: What Firms Need to Know

By Henry Angelino

2018 is coming to a close and many firm leaders are thinking about their plans and goals for 2019. One typical consideration is whether to expand their firm by hiring additional staff and/or attorneys. Do they need an assistant or an associate just to keep up with their case load, and can the budget support another salary? If this is their first employee, they have the added concern of ensuring the structure and procedures are in place to properly manage and efficiently/effectively utilize an employee. Thus, careful planning and research should be part of this major decision, and hiring a new employee should not be taken lightly or done in haste.

So, you think you are ready to move forward and expand your team but aren’t sure of the best path to take in finding a quality candidate. The first step is to make sure you have a complete description of the knowledge/experience requirements, duties and responsibilities for the position, and know the traits you are looking for in your ideal candidate. Additionally, what are your expectations if the position is for a billing professional? Are you looking for a more experienced employee or do you want a less experienced employee that you can train without having to worry about “bad habits” or “knowledge gaps” from previous employers? Do you want to conduct the search or hire a recruiter to do the initial search and screening for you? OK, you have done your homework and are ready to initiate a search. What do you need to know about the current legal hiring market to increase your chance of success? Here are a few trends that I am seeing in San Diego.

-There is an increasing number of smaller and mid-sized firms that are growing and looking for qualified candidates to fill attorney and staff positions. Some of the fastest growing firms are groups of attorneys that have left larger firms to create their own firm and culture.

-There are fewer associate attorneys available due to lower numbers of law students in recent years and it is harder to find associates with three to five years of substantial law firm experience, a typically desired attribute. On the positive side, there is an increasing number of diverse candidates applying for positions.

-Qualified candidates with a solid performance record are in high demand and will usually be exploring multiple opportunities simultaneously. Thus, employers must be ready to move quickly to evaluate quality candidates and make a hiring decision.

-Small to mid-sized law firms are using contract attorneys or part-time support staff personnel to assist with excess legal and administrative tasks. This allows the firm to “test drive” employees before making a permanent hire while remaining within their budget. Another trend is to outsource various human resource and administrative tasks to reduce the time spent to manage the firm and remain compliant with the changing laws and regulations.

-Support staff are more highly qualified and willing to perform multiple roles within small and mid-sized law firms. Many candidates have a paralegal certificate and thus can generate revenue to help offset their salary and benefit costs. Additionally, some more experienced support staff candidates are applying for traditionally entry-level positions and bringing their considerable breadth of skills and experience to smaller firms. Alternately, you will receive a very large number of applications for entry-level positions and will need to separate qualified from unqualified candidates, which can be time-consuming.

-Turnover rates are increasing, causing firm leadership to spend more time hiring and training new employees after a dismissal or departure. Some of the reasons I have seen for this trend is a disparity in values or priorities, employees not meeting stated expectations, and employees not investing the time and effort to build sound legal skills and produce quality work.

Adding new members or service providers to a small or mid-sized law firm team can improve employee and client care, increase productivity, and reduce the time required by leadership to manage the firm while freeing up partners for strategic initiatives, business development and training/mentoring employees. To be successful though, firm management must ensure they carefully and quickly screen qualified candidates to ensure the right cultural and capability fit. Not always an easy task given the current hiring environment!

Henry Angelino is the owner of Angelino & Associates, Inc. and a strategic business and operations consultant for law firms. Read More

Ethical Roadmap for Data Breach or Cyberattack

By Carole Buckner

ABA Formal Opinion 483 provides a roadmap regarding a lawyer’s ethical obligations following a cyberattack or data breach involving confidential client information, where such information is misappropriated, destroyed or otherwise compromised, or where the data event impairs the lawyer’s ability to perform client services.  The ethical obligations of lawyers following a data breach depend on the lawyer’s role, level of authority, and responsibility in the operation of a law firm. Read More

‘Tis the Season for Planning for Success: Tips for your firm’s New Year’s resolutions

By Henry Angelino

The holiday season is in full swing as we prepare for the end of the year and plan for next year. We are attempting to balance our case load with family vacations, the final push for collections with ensuring our employees are rewarded for their dedication, and thinking about how to make 2018 even more successful than 2017. New Year’s resolutions are usually made in January, so here is a brief list of tips to help you get started.

Strategic Plan Review
Do you have a strategic or business plan and when was the last time you reviewed it? Unfortunately, there are numerous competing priorities for your time and handling the immediate needs of a client and/or matter take precedence. However, making the time for a “firm retreat” to create or review a plan can provide clarity and keep you focused in the coming year. Stephen Covey, author of The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, states that you should “start with the end in mind.” As part of the strategic planning process, setting annual goals can assist in achieving your long-term goals (three, five and 10 years).

Business Development Plan Review
This is another tool to keep you personally focused on efforts to generate new clients or additional work from existing clients. Many attorneys will create a business development plan and put it away, never to look at it again. Now is the time to review and update your plan examining your networking progress, marketing efforts, community involvement and client development strategies. Did you join your practice section at the San Diego County Bar Association, alumni groups, professional organizations or civic boards, or volunteer with charities to enhance your professional expertise, expand your network and contribute to the community? What are you doing to strengthen your relationship with your clients? Is your plan reflected in your budget?

Risk Management Assessment
Risk and risk management are familiar terms for attorneys since they deal with them in every litigation case and transaction. Do you apply the same approach to your practice? Do you have policies and procedures in place to minimize the risk of having to disengage from a matter due to a failed client-attorney relationship, having a client file a suit or complaint against you, or the more common occurrence of performing “unintentional” pro bono work for a non-paying client? Risk management starts with the client intake process and continues with client communications, collections and disengagement or closing of the matter. Having a clearly defined process in place enables your firm to achieve consistency and efficiency, and reduce
risk while retaining optimum clients
and establishing a positive
business relationship.

Task Management and Delegation
Your time is important and you want to spend as much of your time practicing law versus administering the firm. Administration cannot be ignored though, so how do you free up more of your time? Make a list of tasks and decisions that you currently perform and then divide the list into two: Executive and Non-Executive Tasks. Executive tasks are items that only you can perform due to your knowledge, their complexity and/or their importance. Non-executive tasks are items that could be delegated to a staff member with the right training, guidance and supervision. Delegate tasks with the right controls, procedures and pre-approved templates in place, and enjoy practicing law more. Read More

You Can’t Spell Diversity Without D.E.I.: The Importance of Equity and Inclusion in Diversity

By Hali Anderson

As someone who has served on various diversity committees, I know firsthand that recruiting diverse students or employees is one thing, but retaining and ensuring that these diverse individuals maximize their potential is a whole different ballgame altogether. In a past issue, I briefly covered the Google lawsuit and the now infamous Google memo written by James Damore. In that memo, Damore shared his ideas on how diversity is harmful to Google as well as the diverse candidates who were being forced into job positions with which, he believed, they were biologically incompatible. Damore’s employment with Google was terminated as a result of this memo. In his subsequent lawsuit, Damore alleged that he felt that he was unlawfully discriminated against for his status as a white male and his conservative viewpoints. The lawsuit and the memo illustrated an interesting dichotomy that we are also seeing play out in our day-to-day lives. As the world becomes more diverse, how does one make sure that everyone still feels included?

How does a school or employer ensure that those who were once or are still in the majority still feel valued and included when the workforce, as they know it, is changing? Conversely, how does a school or employer ensure that those who are changing the workforce feel valued and included?

Now, to be sure, this is nothing new. I’ve listened to my parents and other black Americans talk about their experiences of being bussed in to white schools and the negative impact it had on their psyche and self-esteem. One can imagine how it must have felt to be brought into a new school full of “others” who make you feel unwelcome, yet you are supposed to be thankful for this opportunity that has been thrust upon you. These are natural feelings that any human, let alone a child, would have. If you can put yourself in the shoes of those brave, but scared children, you can see how increasing diversity is not the end of the story. It is the beginning.

Another example — I consider myself to be a proud Xennial. For those of you who don’t know what that is, it’s the generation of people between Generation X and the millennials. As described in an article on Romper.com:

We see ourselves reflected in descriptions of kids who played Oregon Trail, adolescents who used dial-up to chat on AOL instant messenger, and college students using mobile phones for the first time. Our pre-internet childhood separates us from millennials, and it’s obvious now that we’re parents.

Personally, I think that being an Xennial is the best of both worlds because I feel I can relate to and understand both Gen X-ers and millennials. The same is not often true for my two counterparts. Gen X-ers often feel resentful toward the new generation of millennials while millennials may feel unfairly criticized by Gen X-ers. Both Gen X-ers and millennials tend to feel misunderstood by one another. Again, these are emotions with which most people can identify.
While these two examples are vastly different, they both highlight the issue of what happens when there is diversity without inclusion. What is the difference between these two concepts? And how does equity come into play?

Independentsector.org aptly states:

Diversity includes all the ways in which people differ, encompassing the different characteristics that make one individual or group different from another. While diversity is often used in reference to race, ethnicity and gender, it also includes age, national origin, religion, disability, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, education, marital status, language and physical appearance. It also includes diversity of thought: ideas, perspectives and values. We also recognize that individuals affiliate with multiple identities.

Inclusion is the act of creating environments in which any individual or group can be and feel welcomed, respected, supported and valued to fully participate. An inclusive and welcoming climate embraces differences and offers respect in words and actions for all people. It’s important to note that while an inclusive group is by definition diverse, a diverse group isn’t always inclusive.

Equity is the fair treatment, access, opportunity and advancement for all people, while at the same time striving to identify and eliminate barriers that have prevented the full participation of some groups. Improving equity involves increasing justice and fairness within the procedures and processes of institutions or systems, as well as in their distribution of resources. Tackling equity issues requires an understanding of the root causes of outcome disparities within our society.

Or as Dwayne Crenshaw, CEO of RISE San Diego and RISE@Work (quoting Verna Myers), simply puts it, “Diversity is being invited to the party. Inclusion is being asked to dance.” RISE@Work is a local company that offers customized, interactive Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DEI) Leadership Training and consulting to employers and other organizations to help them make sure their workforce can adapt to the world’s increasingly diverse population. To deliver this training, RISE@Work uses Rise Fellows who are diverse leaders in the San Diego community. The trainers are individuals who have experienced lack of equity and inclusion themselves.

JONES, a leadership development, diversity and organizational change consulting firm, is another local company offering such training. Dr. Steven Jones and his team of consultants offer trainings to both education-sector and corporate audiences focusing on the importance of inclusion in maintaining a healthy and thriving environment for students and employees. Dr. Jones explains, “It is important that we train our leaders in companies to be inclusive leaders and to have the skills that allow them to leverage diversity of thought, diversity of talent and diversity of background. This work is a skillset as opposed to a value system. What DEI Training recognizes is that, as a leader, I can have the best of intentions, but if I don’t have the skills to minimize the impact of conscious and unconscious bias, then with the best of intentions, I may fall victim to the “similar to me bias,” which is the desire to work with people that are like myself. My go-to person will be someone that is more similar to me than different. I won’t do that out of prejudice, but instead out of the intention of managing time and risk. When selecting to work with someone who looks just like me, I can use less words with them. I can be more efficient with my time. I am not thinking about diversity — I am thinking of time-management. From a risk management perspective — when I view someone as more similar to me, handing them a job or promotion is less of a risk, because I think, if “I’m smart, they’re smart.” This “similar to me bias” ends up perpetuating a workplace where people do not feel included and, in reality, do not end up having the same opportunities as others.

The reality is that diversity without inclusion is really a recipe for disaster. And I say this as someone who has counseled both employers and employees on these issues, and experienced them myself. What good does it do to recruit diverse talent if the talent does not feel welcomed when they arrive? And finally, what good is feeling welcomed if, in reality, you do not actually have the same opportunity for success? As stated by Meg Bolger, Social Justice Facilitator and Founder of Same Team, “Equity is not an outcome. Equity refers to the process a company consistently engages in to ensure that people with marginalized identities have the opportunity to grow, contribute and develop  —  regardless of their identity.”

These are the exact issues that DEI Training is meant to address. Andrew Picard, Vice President of Operations at San Diego Workforce Partnership, took the laboring oar of running the procurement process for DEI Training at SDWP. Picard explained, “We decided to pursue DEI work not only because it’s the right thing to do, it’s the smart thing to do. Creating a working environment where all people feel empowered to contribute as their full self makes us more effective in executing our mission in the community.” Picard went on to say, “DEI Training has been a valuable and enriching experience. What DEI work teaches us is that it is not any single experience, but a journey with a variety of growth opportunities and tensions along the path. We strive to integrate DEI as a philosophy in which we approach our business, both internally in developing our colleagues and externally in how we serve the region.”

Dr. Jones cautions, “DEI Training alone is not a strategy. Companies must engage in a culture change that supports leaders and the skills they learn during training. Leaders need to be able to apply those skills. Application of these skills requires a culture of accountability and a larger, strategic culture change initiative so managers can develop the necessary skillset for inclusive leadership. It’s an ongoing process.”

With San Diego’s population becoming more diverse every year, it is imperative that schools and employers are prepared to embrace this growth, not to just deal with it. So, San Diego, let’s take the bull by the horns, seize the day and lean on in. The time is here to move from diversity to diversity, equity and inclusion. The success of San Diego depends on it.

Hali Anderson is an attorney with GrahamHollis APC.

This article was originally published in the Sep/Oct 2018 issue of 

San Diego Lawyer Read More

Stop Reading Inadvertently Disclosed Privileged Writing and Notify Counsel

By Rayna A. Stephan

Resist the temptation of examining apparently privileged writing sent inadvertently by opposing counsel. Stop reading and return it to sender.

When an attorney receives a writing that appears to be confidential and privileged, the attorney has an ethical duty not to examine the writing any more than is essential to determine if it is privileged. Then, the attorney shall immediately notify the sender that he or she received material that appears to be privileged, and resolve the issue either by agreement or by seeking the court’s intervention. See Rico v. Mitsubishi Motors Corporation, 42 Cal.4th 807 (2007). The Supreme Court in Rico noted that “[a]n attorney’s obligation is not only to protect his client’s interests but also to respect the legitimate interests of fellow members of the bar, the judiciary, and the administration of justice.” Rico, 42 Cal.4th at 818.

The Rico court adopted the standard applied in State Compensation Insurance Fund v. WPS, Inc., 70 Cal.App.4th 644 (1999), the seminal California decision defining an attorney’s ethical obligations upon receiving another party’s inadvertently disclosed materials protected by the attorney-client privilege. Additionally, the Rico court extended the rule to writings protected by the attorney work product doctrine.

In a more recent opinion, the McDermott court clarified that the attorney’s ethical obligation to return the inadvertently disclosed writing does not only arise when the writing is inadvertently disclosed during discovery in litigation, but such ethical obligation arises regardless of how the lawyer obtained the inadvertently disclosed writing. McDermott Will & Emery LLP v. Superior Court, 10 Cal.App.5th 1083 (2017). The McDermott court also explained that the inadvertent disclosure of a writing protected by the attorney-client privilege does not waive the attorney-client privilege because such disclosure lacks the necessary intent to waive the privilege.

Likewise, in Ardon v. City of Los Angeles, 62 Cal.4th 1176 (2016), the California Supreme Court held that the governmental entity’s inadvertent release of privileged writings in response to a Public Records Act request does not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client or work-product privilege.  The court explained that Government Code section 6254.5 which generally provides that disclosure of a public record waives any privilege applies to intentional and not inadvertent disclosure. The court noted that the legislative history of section 6254.5 explains it is intended to prevent selective disclosure, which is an intentional act and not an inadvertent disclosure.

The California Supreme Court has recently approved a new Rule of Professional Conduct on this issue.  This underscores an attorney’s ethical obligations upon receiving another party’s inadvertently disclosed materials protected by the attorney-client privilege. California Rule of Professional Conduct, Rule 4.4, which will be effective on November 1, 2018, states:

Where it is reasonably apparent to a lawyer who receives a writing relating to a lawyer’s representation of a client that the writing was inadvertently sent or produced, and the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the writing is privileged or subject to the work product doctrine, the lawyer shall:

(a) refrain from examining the writing any more than is necessary to determine that it is privileged or subject to the work product doctrine, and

(b) promptly notify the sender.

Rule 4.4 essentially codifies the case law precedents set out above. Further, the new Rule of Professional Conduct was approved by the California Supreme Court; as such a clear message is being articulated as to the proper handling of inadvertently disclosed privileged materials, whether obtained in the course of discovery or through any other means.  It is therefore incumbent upon attorneys to properly, and ethically, react to inadvertently disclosed privileged writings. Resist the temptation they pose and return the privileged writings to sender.

Rayna A. Stephan

 is the San Diego Chief Deputy City Attorney. Read More