“Succubistic” Lawyer Files Federal Action to Enjoin Discipline
Division 3 of the Fourth District Court of Appeal made headlines in February 2019 with its decision in Martinez v. O’Hara (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 853
Division 3 of the Fourth District Court of Appeal made headlines in February 2019 with its decision in Martinez v. O’Hara (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 853
As a fundamentally different process than trial, mediation requires different steps for effective preparation.
California lawyers must redouble their efforts to comply with and discharge their ethical duties to each other and the public by avoiding conduct that violates Rule 8.4.1.
There is not a day that goes by when Judge Whitney does not wake up excited to go to court.
The secret of a good opening statement is to have a good beginning and a good ending; and to have the two as close together as possible.
Do two felony convictions, one for assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury and the other for discharging a firearm with gross negligence, involve moral turpitude?
This article offers an instructive opportunity to review an attorney’s fundamental ethical obligations to convey settlement offers and abide by the client’s decision even where it may result in the attorney losing a significant part or all of his or her fees.