Tattoos On Trial
This article was originally published in the November/December 2021 issue of San Diego Lawyer Magazine.
This article was originally published in the November/December 2021 issue of San Diego Lawyer Magazine.
By Edward McIntyre
Many jurisdictions adopted a version of ABA Model Rule 1.14 to give guidance when lawyers must confront obligations to a client with diminished decision-making capacity. Our Rules Revision Commission submitted a proposed version of rule 1.14 to the Supreme Court that attempted to reconcile the Model Rule’s approach with unique California obligations, including our obligations of confidentiality.[1] The Court did not adopt proposed rule 1.14. The need for guidance, however, about ethical obligations to clients with diminished capacity remains. The State Bar’s Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct (COPRAC) stepped forward with a recent formal opinion.[2]
This article was originally published in the November/December 2021 issue of San Diego Lawyer Magazine.
This article was originally published in the November/December 2021 issue of San Diego Lawyer Magazine.
By Amy J. Lepine
Do you ever feel disconnected or wish you could relate to people on a deeper level? Tonglen could be the answer. This ancient Tibetan practice in compassion breaks down the barriers of separation and allows us to share more readily in both the sorrow and the joy of others around us. And you don’t have to sit on a cushion or light any incense to do it. In fact, it can be done “on the street.” Literally translated to mean taking and sending, this practice focuses on breathing in the pain and suffering of others and breathing out relief, healing whatever is needed in the moment.
This article was originally published in the November/December 2021 issue of San Diego Lawyer Magazine.
This article was originally published in the November/December 2021 issue of San Diego Lawyer Magazine.